|
Tell us your opinion about the future research in the area of Emerging Risks...
Processing...please wait.
Processing...please wait.
By Country
Processing...please wait.
Yes by Country
Processing...please wait.
No by Country
Processing...please wait.
By Company Activity Type
Records found: 83
1 | Germany | No | The research "Emerging Risk related to New Technologies" must be part of CURRENT R&D. |
2 | Germany | Yes | |
3 | Germany | Yes | |
4 | United Arab Emirates | Yes | The risk topic should be the number one topic at all. It is very important and becomes more and more important. Emerging Risks are corporate, but also public or industrial topic which is not understood ba practitioners on an acceptable level. |
5 | Hungary | Yes | Yes, especially methods and IT tools for Natech events. |
6 | Romania | Yes | because technology evolves and requires new approaches, methods and software for better risk management |
7 | Spain | No | |
8 | Italy | Yes | |
9 | Spain | Yes | |
10 | Spain | No | |
11 | Germany | Yes | Long-term stability of soil and sediment bound organic pollutants; remobilization and bioavailability of such residues.
|
12 | United Kingdom | Yes | The methods and tools need to be able to evolve as the attributes of the environment change and recognise complexity |
13 | Turkey | Yes | |
14 | Germany | No | many people don`t even know the old approaches, methods and IT-tools: that is no sustainability |
15 | Australia | Yes | We are in the IT age. We have Big data and rapidly-changing data in various areas. For Emerging risk analysis, I think new prediction/analysis methods and particularly new IT tools (Internet-based and mobile phone-based) are very important. |
16 | Canada | Yes | |
17 | Germany | Yes | |
18 | Germany | Yes | |
19 | Germany | Yes | Since innovation is progressing fast, the methodologies & tool sets for risk management of new technologies should be playing in the same excellence league ! |
20 | Netherlands | Yes | . . . but only for specific emerging risks related to specific technologies. Probably 90% of the work on these new risks is done once the methods and tools for existing technologies are there. |
21 | Netherlands | Yes | especially the balance between stimulating innovation (the use of new materials, products, technologies) and being precautious (better safe than sorry). Those two don't not automatically go hand in hand meaning that we need to finf ways to deal with the precautionary principle and still give innovation all the possibilities ans psace it needs. |
22 | Austria | Yes | |
23 | Austria | Yes | Definitely. The domains of Cyber-Crime, Cyber-espionage and Cyber-war require the utmost attention of academic, industrial and governmental authorities. It would be gross negligence not to focus on these areas. |
24 | Portugal | Yes | Maybe joining efforts with the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) http://www.irgc.org/ |
25 | Portugal | Yes | |
26 | United States | Yes | As "emerging risks", these risks inherently need new approaches, methods, and tools in most cases |
27 | China | Yes | |
28 | France | Yes | |
29 | Germany | Yes | The research should also focus on the development of strategies to cope with the political instrumentalisation of emerging risks |
30 | Germany | Yes | There is no doubt that emerging risk related to new technologies will play more and more important role in industry and for decision makers in the next years. So, it should be one of priorites in Horizon 2020. |
31 | Germany | Yes | |
32 | Germany | Yes | |
33 | Norway | Yes | |
34 | Germany | Yes | |
35 | Netherlands | Yes | |
36 | Netherlands | Yes | |
37 | Germany | No | |
38 | Germany | Yes | |
39 | Slovenia | Yes | Yes, why not (until we can assure that new approaches, methods and tools are certainly hazard free)? |
40 | Germany | Yes | |
41 | Italy | Yes | |
42 | Israel | Yes | |
43 | Austria | Yes | |
44 | Italy | Yes | |
45 | France | Yes | |
46 | Germany | Yes | |
47 | Germany | Yes | |
48 | Germany | Yes | |
49 | Germany | Yes | |
50 | Germany | Yes | |
51 | Germany | Yes | |
52 | - | Yes | |
53 | France | Yes | |
54 | France | Yes | |
55 | Germany | No | |
56 | Germany | Yes | |
57 | Germany | Yes | |
58 | Germany | Yes | |
59 | Germany | Yes | |
60 | Germany | Yes | |
61 | Germany | Yes | |
62 | Germany | Yes | |
63 | Germany | Yes | |
64 | Germany | Yes | |
65 | Germany | Yes | |
66 | Germany | Yes | |
67 | Germany | Yes | |
68 | Germany | Yes | |
69 | Germany | Yes | |
70 | Germany | Yes | |
71 | Germany | Yes | |
72 | Germany | Yes | |
73 | Germany | Yes | |
74 | Germany | Yes | |
75 | Germany | No | |
76 | Germany | No | |
77 | Germany | No | |
78 | Germany | No | |
79 | Germany | Yes | |
80 | Germany | Yes | |
81 | Norway | Yes | In some way the results from the iNTeg-Risk project should be exploited, extended and further developed and adjusted in Horizon 2020. |
82 | United Kingdom | No | I think that Emerging Risks are an interestng research area but I do not believe that they should be a Community priority in a time of constrained resources. The other areas mentioned in Horizon 2020 are higher priority for the community as a whole. |
83 | Poland | Yes | There is still a significant needs to develop these topics for goverment and industry decison makers. |
|
|
|
|